Commonplace
-

Publick Occurrences 2.0

October 24, 2012

The “Wisdom” of the Founders

It’s October of a presidential election year, which means the political pundit class is alive with speculation of the likelihood of different results in the popular vote and the Electoral College or – and this one has really gotten people going, thanks to some speculation and number crunching by Five Thirty Eight blogger Nate Silver – if the Electoral College comes out in a 269-269 tie. (Two side points: first, take a look at the first scenario he games out; the scary part is it has the air of plausibility, that is, the electoral map theoretically could happen, even if the odds are extremely low. Second, as others have pointed out, you should know you’re being trolled when you read a sentence that states that the “probability [of a tie] has roughly doubled from a few weeks ago, when the chances had been hovering at about 0.3 percent instead.”)

The op-eds, editorials, blog posts, and tweets that game out these scenarios all operate under the premise that such an outcome would be a “constitutional crisis.” And that’s true to a point, but what I have not seen any discussion of in the mainstream media to this point is that such an Electoral College occurrence, however fluky it might be, would represent a failure not so much of the Constitution as of the political system built up around it. Such an election, in fact, does exactly what the Constitution of 1787 (as modified by the Twelfth Amendment) requires. The winner of the presidential election is the candidate with the most electoral votes; Art. II, § 1 is agnostic on the method by which each state determines its electors, and a popular majority was in no one’s imagination in 1787.

Why don’t commentators or politicians discuss the problem of an Electoral College tie (or a “split decision”) as a Constitutional matter rather than a political one? One answer comes from Sanford Levinson, whom I heard speak for the first time this week when he visited my campus. Levinson, who teaches at Harvard Law School and the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, argued simply that no one is willing to have the conversation. The discussion about the Constitution, he suggested, goes only so far for the two candidates as to express their devotion to the document of the Founders. (At this point Levinson expressed nostalgic longing for the campaign of 1912, which featured constitutional reformers Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt as well as the future Chief Justice William Howard Taft.)

Levinson is most famous in Constitutional studies circles for his advocacy of a new constitutional convention to remedy the problems he sees in the current document—and the greatest failure of 1787, he suggests, is the empty vessel of Article V, which provides for the Constitution’s amendment with absolutely no guidance as to how it might happen. He argued in his talk on Monday that the Constitution would “render the election (nearly) irrelevant,” a provocative claim that little would occur in the sphere of domestic policy no matter which candidate wins because of the likely split in Congress. In foreign affairs, he argued, the difference matters, but in that case he critiques Presidents (dating back to Truman) for ignoring Congress in matters of war, peace, and national security.

The discussion was intriguing, and I’m glad that a number of students got to see history in action, as Levinson touched on a number of areas that we had covered in the U.S. survey within the past week, not least the vagueness of Article II’s grant of executive power. Within the context of the talk, I asked Levinson how he proposed to get a constitutional convention enacted, given that it required the assistance of the very political structures that fail in other regards now and that the very vagueness that he critiqued was a feature of the Constitution that worked well for either party at various times. His answer was not particularly satisfying – either we have to go over the cliff and have a true crisis moment (which is hopefully unlikely) or people must decide they’re just fed up. I’m not sure I’d go as far as Levinson, though I do think the conversation would be helpful, and that historians can and should take part in it to explain the processes by which the Constitution came about in 1787 and those that have shaped the document since.

What I did not get to ask about, and which may take a few more blog posts to fully flesh out, is the importance of what Levinson alluded to at the beginning of his talk: reverence for the Constitution. Setting aside how to fix any problems with the Constitution, any conversation along those lines must start from the premise that the Constitution is changeable, and I’m not sure that’s an easy starting point for many people given the enduring popularity of originalism and “Founders’ Chic.” It’s difficult, in other words, to have a true conversation about the Electoral College that elides the fact that a 269-269 tie leading to the House electing Mitt Romney as President and the Senate re-electing Joe Biden as Vice President is precisely the system the Founders bestowed on the nation.

Share

20 Comments »

  1. Many will criticize the Electoral College, but few will blame those who created it. New at Publick Occurrences: http://t.co/sP9gFEUw

    Comment by Joseph Adelman (@jmadelman) — October 24, 2012 @ 8:34 am

  2. PM RT Many will criticize the Electoral College, but few will blame those who created it. New at Publick Occurrences: http://t.co/sP9gFEUw

    Comment by Joseph Adelman (@jmadelman) — October 24, 2012 @ 12:33 pm

  3. Adelman on the founders, the potential for an electoral-college tie, and Constitution-worship: http://t.co/TApvMJRt

    Comment by William Hogeland (@WilliamHogeland) — October 25, 2012 @ 3:26 pm

  4. The writers of the constitution did not agree on what they had wrought. James Madison kept changing his mind as to what the constitution meant, thus embarrassing himself more than once. Political expediancy trumped originalism.

    Comment by steve goodell — November 1, 2012 @ 4:05 pm

  5. [...] out that few paid attention to the preamble (the portion that we now consider sacrosanct as part of our national mythos). That language was frankly not particularly controversial to a gentleman well educated in the [...]

    Pingback by Publick Occurrences 2.0 » What People Don’t Get About Historical Context — December 2, 2012 @ 1:46 pm

  6. How about making things more exciting by customising the occasion. There are other ways to aid the elimination of acid reflux that doesn’t involve eating, this is accomplished by limiting your food intake.
    A common problem with substitution is that they don. She does this for the puppies to eat as
    a way of weaning them onto solid foods. Alcoholic beverages affect blood sugar by upsetting carbohydrate metabolism.
    You absolutely must eat something every two to three hours.
    The entrepreneur will own a meaningful portion of a
    far bigger asset. Peas, plumbs, apples or mangos; on to the walls,
    they’re doing the tango.

    Comment by cooking leeks — December 29, 2014 @ 4:21 pm

  7. Spot on with this write-up, I seriously feel
    this web site needs a lot more attention. I’ll probably be back
    again to read more, thanks for the info!

    Comment by idata new zealand — December 29, 2014 @ 9:41 pm

  8. Finding a person who does not like any kind of
    music is a task ‘next to impossible’. Vine being the latest thing out there, you might have already started using it to
    remain ahead of the crowd. The only question that remains
    for now is, how are you going to use Vine to promote or inform your audiences.

    Comment by #IDFWU — December 30, 2014 @ 10:01 am

  9. In the case of the platform, Garmin Connect v2 (Modern) has come a fair approaches considering that the initial Vivofit
    launch in February.

    my page Garmin Maps Update free

    Comment by Garmin Maps Update free — January 4, 2015 @ 11:03 am

  10. And on top of that, they also do not have to specialize in just one
    product or service, making them resilient to market crashes.
    Design Automation (Nasdaq:LAVA), today announced that the new pattern matching capability in the
    Quartz. It provides unique Skills Management tools through which companies can analyze
    bottlenecks in their infrastructure Tugboat’s solution presents
    an overview of the in-house skill sets available to production managers and ensuresthat humanresources
    are being utilized optimally to meet production plans.

    (2) in the early stage of the product to see three-dimensional simulation model of the product, while three-dimensional environment should be able to easily observe the product model in any section of
    interest, as the basis for project selection. Product design and configuration will
    first be streamlined into a definitive plan. ” 1 Lush Games Exporters assured journalists of which this market is exceedingly poor. The research is generally made in order to make some of the best solvents keeping in mind the requirements of the customers and the clients. When preparing for outgoing deliveries, the organization of workers and the process of loading the finished goods into the truck can be somewhat chaotic.

    Comment by regenerative air dryer — January 4, 2015 @ 8:06 pm

  11. I do agree with all of the concepts you have introduced in your post.
    They are very convincing and will certainly work. Still, the
    posts are very quick for starters. Could you please prolong them a little from next time?
    Thanks for the post.

    Comment by guru ke rumah jakarta — January 16, 2015 @ 9:44 am

  12. As a cycle commuter of some years in London, this compilation video
    reflects the overall impression I get on my option to work every day.

    Comment by failarmy 2014 youtube — January 16, 2015 @ 5:59 pm

  13. I pay a quick visit day-to-day some web pages and blogs
    to read articles or reviews, however this webpage provides feature based
    content.

    Comment by i love men — January 17, 2015 @ 10:31 am

  14. I believe that is one of the most important
    info for me. And i am satisfied studying your article.
    However wanna statement on some common things, The website style is ideal, the articles is actually nice : D.

    Good job, cheers

    Comment by fail funny videos — January 17, 2015 @ 9:02 pm

  15. Austin is the life of the group- a purple kangaroo who’s always animated and prepared to lenjd a hand to anyone.

    Comment by wheels on the bus — February 24, 2015 @ 3:59 pm

  16. great points altogether, you simply gained a logo new reader.

    What could you suggest about your put up that you simply made a few days ago?
    Any certain?

    Comment by Pro Max Pump Supplement — February 26, 2015 @ 12:51 am

  17. It’s hard to find experienced people for this topic, but you
    seem like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

    Comment by Lumagenex Anti Wrinkle — March 8, 2015 @ 1:55 am

  18. whoah this blog is magnificent i really like studying your posts.
    Stay up the good work! You know, lots of individuals are looking around for this information, you can help them
    greatly.

    Comment by Facial Toner Cream — March 8, 2015 @ 7:27 pm

  19. Valuable info. Lucky me I discovered your website unintentionally, and I’m shocked why this twist of fate did not took
    place earlier! I bookmarked it.

    Comment by daikin hvac — March 9, 2015 @ 12:44 am

  20. Thank you for any other informative web site.
    Where else may I get that kind of information written in such an ideal way?
    I have a challenge that I am just now operating on, and I have been on the look out for such information.

    Comment by Hvac maintenance — March 20, 2015 @ 2:57 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Copyright © Common-place The Interactive Journal of Early American Life, Inc., all rights reserved
Powered by WordPress